Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Assessing the FLITE Strategic Plan: 4.3 Investigate how some positions should change (i.e. using ACRL Standards, library trends, SWOT analyses, university priorities, faculty experience, student needs)

Formula & Score-at-a-Glance

4.3 Investigate how some positions should change (i.e. using ACRL Standards, library trends, SWOT analyses, university priorities, faculty experience, student needs)

 yellow square 

Formula: Informed decisions + appropriate work + appropriate workload = balanced library services benefiting users

Process

  • This is in progress now (ties with 4.2). Examples include the Optometry and Life Sciences Librarian, the Technology Integration Web Services Librarian, and now that we have finished the staff conversations, we’ll work on the vacant CT position in CAS.

Associated Measures

NO MEASURES HAVE BEEN DECIDED ON YET

Associated Data

  • Statistics from RIS (can inform workload)
  • Statistics from CAS (can inform workload)
  • Top trends in academic libraries

Target

  • Use the May 2017 Committee Report-Outs about the work being done in FLITE.
  • Have a discussion at the August 2017 All-College Meeting about library top trends

Rubrics/Questions Used to Determine Score

  • Were library personnel engaged in conversations about these issues?
  • How useful/informative were they?
  • What feedback was gathered?
  • How many positions changed as results of this analysis?

Results

  • Duty roster developed for the vacant CAS position

Data Collector & Frequency

Data Collector/Owner(s):

  • Scott Garrison
  • Carrie Donovan
  • Leah Monger

[Note: Scott Garrison and Carrie Donovan are no longer employed by FLITE. March 2019]